AApparently nothing illegal nothing wrong with the fact that you can request the help of a person traveling in the same direction to move you even through an intermediary but the way the service is designed it is very similar to transportation offered by taxi drivers. However it is carried out without the authorization required for taxi drivers to transport people in the public interest based on law . The activity of Uber itself is not illegal but the activity of Uber drivers is illegal.
Ridesharing or transportation of people in the public interest One of Ubers frequent defenses Country Email List has been to define the service provided by Uber drivers as a ridesharing system a system in which for example a person individually decides to travel in a certain direction and then decides to find another person who go in the same direction to share the cost of the trip. However the problem arises in the way the Uber circuit is designed because practically I the customer access the application set which destination.
I want and then call choose an Uber driver to take me to the destination. My consent is subsequent to the consent of the Uber driver who by reduction to the absurd perhaps that day did not want to split the costs of the ride with someone else. taxi which carries out the transportation of persons in the public interest than to a ridesharing activity. Furthermore Ubers activity shows no intention of sharing the costs of the trip between the Uber driver and the person being transported. This is because at the end of the journey the person does not pay anything the money being taken from their account when making the order and a share of this amount goes to the Uber driver. Looking at it plastically every car license holder with a car becomes a taxi driver in.
發表於 13:31:03
